Skip to content
Home » How Can Insurance Bad Faith Affect a Car Accident Claim?

How Can Insurance Bad Faith Affect a Car Accident Claim?

Insurance companies owe duties of good faith and fair dealing. When they breach these duties through unreasonable claim handling, bad faith claims arise. Bad faith can transform an ordinary car accident case into one with significantly greater recovery potential.

The Concept of Bad Faith

Bad faith occurs when insurers:

Unreasonably Deny Valid Claims

Denying coverage without proper investigation or justification.

Fail to Defend

Refusing to provide the defense owed under liability policies.

Unreasonably Delay

Taking excessive time to investigate, evaluate, or pay claims.

Fail to Settle

Refusing reasonable settlement opportunities when liability is clear.

Lowball Offers

Making offers far below claim value to pressure acceptance.

First-Party vs. Third-Party Bad Faith

Different relationships create different claims:

First-Party Bad Faith

Claims against your own insurer for mishandling your claims under UM, UIM, PIP, or other first-party coverages.

Third-Party Bad Faith

Claims arising when insurers mishandle defense or settlement of liability claims.

Common Bad Faith Conduct

Specific behaviors supporting bad faith claims:

Inadequate Investigation

Failing to investigate claims before denial.

Ignoring Evidence

Disregarding evidence supporting the claim.

Misrepresenting Policy Provisions

Incorrectly stating what coverage provides.

Arbitrary Denials

Denying claims without reasonable basis.

Unreasonable Interpretation

Reading policy provisions in unreasonably narrow ways.

Failure to Communicate

Not keeping policyholders informed about claim status.

Improper Coverage Defenses

Raising defenses without reasonable basis.

The Excess Judgment Scenario

A classic third-party bad faith situation:

Clear Liability

The policyholder is clearly liable for an accident.

Policy Limits Demand

The injured party offers to settle for policy limits.

Insurer Refuses

The insurer unreasonably rejects the settlement offer.

Excess Verdict

The case goes to trial and produces a verdict exceeding policy limits.

Bad Faith Exposure

The insurer may be liable for the entire judgment, not just policy limits, due to its bad faith failure to settle.

Stowers Doctrine

Some states impose specific settlement duties:

Settlement Demands

When a reasonable settlement demand within policy limits is made.

Clear Liability

When liability is reasonably clear.

Duty to Accept

Insurers may have a duty to accept the settlement.

Excess Exposure

Failure creates potential liability for excess judgments.

Remedies for Bad Faith

Successful bad faith claims may recover:

Contract Damages

The benefits that should have been paid.

Consequential Damages

Losses flowing from the bad faith, such as attorney fees, lost time, and emotional distress.

Punitive Damages

Where particularly egregious conduct is proven.

Attorney Fees

Fees incurred in pursuing the bad faith claim.

Proving Bad Faith

Bad faith claims require showing:

Claim Was Valid

The underlying claim was covered and should have been paid.

Denial Was Unreasonable

The insurer knew or should have known the claim was valid.

Lack of Reasonable Basis

No reasonable basis existed for the denial.

Knowledge of No Reasonable Basis

In some jurisdictions, the insurer must have known there was no reasonable basis.

Defenses to Bad Faith

Insurers defend bad faith claims through:

Reasonable Investigation

Evidence of thorough claim investigation.

Genuine Dispute

The existence of a legitimate coverage question.

Reliance on Experts

Reasonable reliance on medical or other expert opinions.

Policy Interpretation

Reasonable interpretation of ambiguous policy language.

Jurisdictional Variations

Bad faith laws vary significantly:

Common Law Bad Faith

Some states recognize only common law bad faith claims.

Statutory Bad Faith

Some states have enacted specific bad faith statutes.

Private Cause of Action

Not all states permit private lawsuits; some limit enforcement to regulators.

Damage Limitations

Some states limit available damages.

Documentation Importance

Building bad faith claims requires documentation:

Correspondence Records

All communications with the insurer.

Claim Timeline

Dates of claim submission, insurer actions, and delays.

Denial Letters

Written denials and stated reasons.

Evidence Submitted

Records of evidence provided to the insurer.

Insurer Requests

Documentation of all insurer requests and your responses.

Strategic Considerations

Preservation of Claims

Actions during claim handling can preserve or waive bad faith claims.

Settlement Implications

Settling underlying claims may affect bad faith claims.

Timing Issues

When to raise bad faith versus when to focus on the underlying claim.

Expert Testimony

Insurance industry experts may testify about claim handling standards.

Practical Guidance

Document all interactions with insurers meticulously.

Respond promptly and thoroughly to insurer requests.

Keep copies of everything submitted.

Note unreasonable delays or requests.

Consult counsel if you suspect bad faith.

Understand your state’s specific bad faith framework.

Bad faith claims transform the power dynamic between insurers and claimants. When insurers act unreasonably, bad faith exposure can convert modest claims into significant recoveries.


Sources:

  • Bad faith doctrines: State case law and statutes
  • Stowers doctrine: G.A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co., 15 S.W.2d 544 (Tex. 1929)
  • Excess judgment exposure: Insurance bad faith case law